The Interconnection of Arts and Science: Three Inspiring Tales
Written on
I find myself uniquely positioned to initiate this discussion as it touches upon two of my greatest passions: the arts and science. My educational journey began with a degree in literature, a field I have always held dear. I then pursued a master's in publishing and editing to assist others in realizing their literary aspirations. My time spent in these areas was fulfilling, yet a nagging desire compelled me to delve into another master's program—this time in Astronomy.
Transitioning from the arts to science made me anxious, but passion has a way of overcoming fear. To my surprise, I thrived in the scientific arena, completing my degree with high honors. Interestingly, I found that studying astronomy closely parallels the study of literature.
Both fields present us with captivating subjects that require deep analysis to be comprehended. Whether it’s a character from Jane Eyre or the celestial body Pluto, we draw upon our existing knowledge and make educated hypotheses. We gather evidence to support these theories, test them, and ultimately develop understanding.
This process mirrors the study of art, albeit not its creation, which is equally driven by the same fervor, courage, and romanticism that fuels scientific progress.
How often have I heard the remark, “I don’t grasp science, I’m a creative,” as if the two domains were distinct and that science lacks the creativity inherent in the arts?
Below, I present three true stories of extraordinary scientists whose lives are as riveting as any novel; their character and steadfast belief in truth have reshaped our existence, leaving a legacy as significant as any celebrated artwork.
Giordano Bruno
Giordano Bruno was a visionary, tragically ahead of his time. As an astronomer and mathematician, he championed the quest for knowledge, encouraging relentless inquiry into our surroundings. His courage and integrity became his undoing; his refusal to conform to societal norms was as heroic as any literary protagonist willing to face dire consequences for their beliefs—unfortunately, his story is all too real.
Bruno is credited as the first individual to assert that our Sun is merely one of countless stars in the universe. He theorized that each star likely has its own orbiting planets, suggesting that Earth is not unique and may be one of many inhabited worlds. These views clashed with prevailing religious doctrines, ultimately leading to his downfall.
Initially, Bruno was a monk in Naples, but after being caught reading forbidden texts, he fled. His travels took him across Italy, France, Switzerland, England, and Germany, where he lectured, published, and made influential connections, often challenging those who disagreed with him, earning himself many adversaries.
After 16 years on the run, he returned to Venice to share his theories but was denounced to the Inquisition and transferred to Rome for heresy charges. For seven years, he remained imprisoned, repeatedly pressured to renounce his beliefs, particularly regarding the existence of other worlds. He steadfastly refused.
His last words in court were haunting: “Perhaps you pronounce this sentence against me with greater fear than I receive it.” The Church offered him 40 days to reconsider his stance, but he stood firm.
Bruno was executed in Rome’s Campo de’ Fiori, where a statue now commemorates his sacrifice, a stark reminder of the price paid for truth. Established in 1889 amid Church protests, this statue serves as an annual site of remembrance for free thought, honoring Bruno’s bravery and intensity, which continue to inspire even 400 years later.
The Catholic Church has yet to apologize for their actions, claiming in 2000 that their past decisions, though unfortunate, were necessary to uphold their beliefs.
Sophia Louisa Jex-Blake
For a story of resilience and integrity, look no further than Sophia Louisa Jex-Blake. Initially, she worked as a mathematics teacher but was barred from receiving a salary because her father refused to sign the necessary documents. Her passion for women's education led her to the United States, where she researched and published a book on the subject. There, she encountered Dr. Lucy Ellen Sewall, one of the first female medical graduates in America, which inspired Jex-Blake to pursue medicine herself.
When she applied to Harvard, she was denied due to her gender. Realizing her chances of acceptance in England were slim, she turned to the University of Edinburgh, which offered a lukewarm acceptance, citing the need for adjustments that could not accommodate a single female student.
Undeterred, Jex-Blake sought out other women interested in medical training through a newspaper advertisement. This led to the formation of the "Edinburgh Seven," who were eventually accepted into the university.
However, their presence incited backlash from certain men, resulting in harassment and threats. During the Surgeons Hall Riot, a mob of 200 men attempted to prevent the women from taking their exams. A brave male medical student intervened, allowing the women to enter the hall.
Despite the hostility, the Edinburgh Seven completed their exams successfully. Yet, the university refused to award them degrees, citing their gender as a barrier.
Jex-Blake did not concede defeat. She established her own medical schools, training women to become doctors. The global attention surrounding the mistreatment of these women led to legislative changes, allowing women to study at British universities from 1876 onward. Jex-Blake later passed her exams at a different institution, ultimately earning her medical degree.
She went on to establish a medical practice and the first hospital for women, managed by women. In 2019, the University of Edinburgh finally acknowledged the accomplishments of the Edinburgh Seven and awarded them their degrees.
Ignaz Semmelweis
For a gripping tale of tragedy and injustice, consider Ignaz Semmelweis, whose struggle to convince medical professionals of their culpability in patient deaths is both haunting and enlightening.
Upon joining Vienna General Hospital in 1846, Semmelweis discovered a troubling disparity between two maternity wards: one with a 4% mortality rate and the other at 10%. Doctors in the second ward, performing autopsies and handling corpses, failed to wash their hands before attending to new mothers. Meanwhile, the first ward was managed by students and midwives without access to cadavers. Semmelweis theorized that "cadaveric particles" were being transferred to patients, leading to infections—a notion that seemed outrageous at the time.
To validate his hypothesis, he mandated that doctors wash their hands with a chlorine solution, known for eliminating odors associated with decaying bodies. By 1847, the mortality rate had spiked to 18.3%, but within a month of implementing his protocol, it dropped below 2%.
Rather than acclaim, Semmelweis faced ridicule; his assertions about cadaveric particles were dismissed, and the medical community refused to accept that their negligence was causing harm.
After losing his position, Semmelweis relocated to Budapest and repeated his hand-washing campaign, once again leading to significantly reduced death rates. Despite publishing papers and garnering some support, his efforts remained largely ignored.
Driven to desperation by the obstinacy of his peers, Semmelweis eventually became a vocal critic, calling out prominent obstetricians as negligent. In 1865, he was committed to a mental institution under false pretenses and tragically died two weeks later, believed to be from injuries sustained during his confinement.
Only two decades later did Louis Pasteur's research vindicate Semmelweis's claims, leaving us to ponder the lives lost due to the medical community's refusal to heed his warnings.
Today, Ignaz Semmelweis is honored as the "father of infection control," his relentless pursuit of truth exemplifying the creativity and passion inherent in both art and science.
The Interwoven Nature of Truth and Beauty
Art and science are deeply intertwined, whether through the meticulous process of baking bread, the architectural design of a sturdy building, or achieving the perfect paint hue. Both realms, while occasionally perceived as rigid, share a common goal: the pursuit of truth and beauty.
Indeed, parts of the scientific domain may seem cold, yet the art world can be equally sterile. Artists often engage in tedious calculations or revisions, demonstrating that creativity is essential in both fields.
Ultimately, both art and science flourish through creativity, courage, and authenticity. They embody humanity's finest qualities, reminding us that both sectors deserve support.
So the next time someone dismissively states, "I’m not interested in science, I’m a creative," feel free to share these stories that illustrate how science is, in fact, a realm of creativity and passion, worthy of the most inspiring human endeavors.
Please click here if you would like to support my writing and gain full access to Medium at the same time. Thank you!