The Unpredictable Essence of Reality

We inhabit a universe that offers an astonishing array of experiences, and for that, we should express gratitude. The universe, seemingly indifferent to our existence, provides a wealth of matter, radiation, and physical laws conducive to life.

However, two stark realities trouble me:

1. The second law of thermodynamics, which dictates entropy's relentless rise.
2. The universe's accelerating expansion.

Both factors, on their own, indicate an inevitable conclusion: all available energy and matter will eventually be depleted, leading to the extinction of life and intellect. While this outcome is a natural consequence of the universe's indifference, acknowledging it poses a significant challenge.

Understanding these truths is one thing; determining how to respond is quite another. If we strip away the philosophical comforts humanity has developed over centuries, we must confront a disheartening truth: the entire history and evolution of mankind loses meaning if intelligent life itself is finite. The realization that we are ephemeral renders our existence seemingly purposeless.

Fundamental physics suggests that regardless of our enjoyment in the present, all our creations will eventually fade into nothingness. Yet, society appears largely unconcerned, choosing to ignore the enormity of this truth. Just as individuals often evade the reality of mortality, collectively we tend to overlook the transient nature of intelligence and existence.

This is undeniably tragic, yet I remain optimistic. While the laws of physics appear unyielding, I believe it is premature to assert that we cannot challenge them. Moreover, as the only known bearers of intelligence, we carry a profound responsibility for all existence.

Our engagement with physics has spanned merely a few centuries. To claim that the second law of thermodynamics is insurmountable based on such limited experience would be naive and reckless. Without delving deeply into the debate over the immutability of physical laws, I assert that our current understanding is insufficient to dismiss the potential for alterations in those laws.

Perhaps, after countless years of rigorous inquiry into the nature of energy, matter, space, and time, we might conclude that an end is unavoidable. Alternatively, we could choose to relish the journey, disregarding the universe's eventual demise.

But today is not that day. It remains early, and we must continue our struggle.

The Sole Determinant of Value

Ultimately, existence itself serves as the final arbiter of value. Our aspirations, passions, and ethical frameworks are rendered meaningless if they culminate in our extinction. Regardless of how appealing our ideals may seem, they become detrimental if they lead to our downfall.

The imperative to safeguard intelligent life justifies any means necessary, as entities devoid of intelligence lose significance. While this line of reasoning may appear morally dubious, I contend that it is far more immoral to resign the universe to oblivion merely to adhere to our ethical standards and feel at ease.

Even if one's affections lie not with the universe but with culture, ethics, or individuals, it is vital to ensure the continued existence of the contexts in which these values reside. In any form of existence, there lies potential, hope, and opportunity—attributes utterly absent in non-existence. Existence transcends all else.

The discovery of other intelligent civilizations could alleviate some of our concerns. However, this scenario presents a classic prisoner's dilemma: while individual civilizations may benefit from inaction, collective efforts would yield greater rewards.

The costs are clear: battling the laws of physics consumes vast resources that might otherwise be dedicated to enjoyment. Each civilization may prefer to shift the burden of this struggle onto others.

Thus, while the existence of other intelligent beings would be encouraging, we cannot depend on others to shoulder this responsibility. Ideally, cooperation should be organized, but we may need to proceed independently. Regardless, the pursuit of extraterrestrial civilizations forms a crucial part of our strategy to avert the extinction of intelligent life.

A Society Focused on Realistic Progress

In a perfect world, we would allocate all our resources toward conquering the universe, embarking on unrestrained exploration and innovation. However, one must question whether such a society could be stable and enduring. Can humanity, in its current state, sustain such an approach over time? Would the means be worse than the ends? While a society fervently committed to scientific inquiry and technological advancement is desirable, expecting such a society to exist amid humanity's present characteristics is unrealistic.

Consequently, a more gradual transition to a progress-oriented society may be necessary. We must acknowledge the limitations of Homo sapiens, who, despite their achievements in acquiring knowledge, possess inherent negative traits.

While these characteristics can evolve, they will persist for the foreseeable future, and our plans for progress must account for this reality. This means that individuals require rest, social engagement, culture, and art—institutions not directly tied to technological advancement. Although these aspects can influence progress, they are essential to human nature.

In summary, our short-term strategy should focus on fostering economic and technological growth without radical changes that risk civilization's stability. We must recognize that scientific breakthroughs can only occur when the necessary conditions are in place.

What do we need? It is straightforward—what we typically refer to as progress:

1. An increase in the population and other intelligent beings.
2. An expansion of intelligence, whether natural or artificial.
3. More matter and energy.
4. Greater knowledge.
5. Enhanced technology.
6. An abundance of time.

All plans, efforts, and strategies that lead to these outcomes are beneficial. Those who wish for reality to endure have numerous allies across diverse ideologies and doctrines that promote progress, economic growth, technology, and science.

In the future, a comprehensive plan to counteract the laws of physics will be essential, grounded in fundamental physical research. We can already begin to identify promising research avenues that may help mitigate the adverse effects of the second law of thermodynamics. Concepts like the Poincaré recurrence theorem and Boltzmann brains might offer some hope, as could unraveling the mysteries of dark energy in our quest to combat the universe's expansion.

However, this remains speculative, necessitating thorough professional investigation.

It's Not Premature to Address This

Some readers may wonder whether it is too early to consider these issues. I assert that it is not, for several reasons.

First, every moment we delay represents a tremendous loss of resources. The universe is expanding—and accelerating! Each second, vast quantities of matter in distant galaxies race away from us at speeds that render them unreachable at sub-light velocities. We are losing unimaginable amounts of matter and energy as a result.

In the far future, when every gram of hydrogen is invaluable, our descendants may lament humanity's earlier carelessness. Moreover, the second law of thermodynamics compounds this issue: energy dissipates and transforms into forms that are unusable. Countless stars burn out, radiating energy into the void, never to be reclaimed.

All this lost energy could have fueled supercomputers tasked with modeling theoretical physics.

Second, initiating this process sooner means fewer adjustments will be required later. Minor oversights today can evolve into significant challenges tomorrow. We must seize this opportunity to guide humanity away from unproductive paths.

If we fail to adjust the course of history in time, it may demand far more resources in the future to rectify. It is easier to enhance the effectiveness of institutions now than to overhaul them later. Each component of civilization is intricately woven into its framework, and extracting it can be laborious.

Third, we must prioritize the immediate survival of humanity. Before entropy leads to the demise of intelligent life, we face threats from nuclear war, asteroid impacts, environmental disasters, the sun's eventual death, or unforeseen dangers.

These risks require monitoring and mitigation now; we do not possess billions of years to spare. As we strive for our ultimate goal, we must also ensure our survival along the way.

Fourth, progress is inherently beneficial! By contributing to economic, technical, and scientific advancements, we can enjoy numerous positive side effects that resonate with individuals across various ideologies and preferences.

Advocates for the long-term survival of humanity can find common ground with proponents of prevailing economic and political doctrines, as many share instrumental goals.

Fifth, we may achieve more than we anticipate. Who knows—perhaps we can circumvent the first law of thermodynamics? Imagine the heights humanity could reach if we learned to manipulate the laws of physics at will!

The notion of ensuring the eternity of intelligent life aligns well with fostering a society devoted to humanity's development, understanding the natural world, and acquiring technological prowess. Yes, we may sacrifice some leisure time, but isn't the pursuit worth it?

Humanity's Responsibility to the Universe

Humanity faces an unprecedented challenge. No achievement, no dream compares to the monumental task of altering the laws of physics to secure our survival.

To dismiss this endeavor as fantastical is to underestimate the enormity of the solutions we seek. However, we are just at the beginning of this journey. We have yet to explore numerous possibilities, many of which remain unknown. We will not surrender.

Before us lies a vast universe, brimming with matter and energy! These resources could be at our disposal for billions of years. Who can predict what we might accomplish when we harness them, combining them with our exponentially expanding knowledge?

Let us acknowledge that the universe has treated us quite favorably. The joys derived from our existence are boundless in their variety. Let us strive to express our gratitude to reality by ensuring its enduring existence.

Let not the magnitude of this task intimidate us; as always, we should think on a grand scale while acting locally. Countless initiatives can be undertaken now, and most will prove interesting and beneficial regardless of immediate outcomes. Even if progress is slow, we still possess billions of years to explore.

I believe it is essential to dedicate ourselves to the goal of making intelligence eternal. I would label this philosophy as Eternalism: a movement aimed at securing the everlasting existence of intelligence in the universe!

The Apeiron Blog — Simplifying Big Questions

We recognize that philosophy can appear complex at times. To simplify matters, we curate the best articles, news, reading lists, and other free resources to assist you on your journey. Join us by following our Medium page and signing up for our free mailing list.