As we contemplate the latest Las Vegas UFO incident, which suggests alien presence rather than a crash, we are left questioning: what would our reaction be if confronted by extraterrestrial visitors?

Imagine working on your vehicle at dusk when a startling noise catches your attention. You glance up to find two eight-foot beings with large eyes and thin lips gazing at you from across a fence. This doesn’t seem like a deliberate first contact effort from either party. The humans opted to call the police, as if that would help. Did either party even attempt a greeting? Unlike the supposed crash in Brazil's Varginha, which featured small beings with sulfuric odors, this incident doesn’t fit the Roswell narrative. Why do these accounts seem so bizarre?

Local news channels appeared to assume a crash instead of a landing. Is this their only way of interpreting the potential visitation of extraterrestrial beings?

In 2015, Michael Logan distanced himself from the core inquiry, framing it as a question posed by SyFy rather than his own. The SyFy series Childhood’s End raises the question: can humanity coexist peacefully with aliens? Perhaps Logan is merely echoing Arthur C. Clarke’s vision, as many literary works explore themes of peace, love, and the pitfalls of conflict. Barry B. Longyear's Enemy Mine comes to mind—while the film adaptation lacks depth, the books convey powerful messages worth reading.

But perhaps the more pressing question is whether humans can coexist peacefully with one another. The answer is likely a resounding yes; most people are generally compassionate. We care deeply for our families, neighbors, communities, environments, and cultures, and we are often eager to learn about others, as evidenced by the role of tourism in supporting local economies.

We cherish history and strive to encounter authentic narratives during our travels, preferring to witness the stories we've read about rather than witnessing their destruction for new developments.

It is often those grappling with mental health issues that complicate life for others. Without proper avenues to identify and assist those in need, conflict can arise. Additionally, individuals unfit for leadership often find themselves in positions of power, leading to societal imbalances that require rectification by ordinary citizens.

A reality exists wherein the most suitable candidates for rational governance avoid political office due to the inherent madness of the system. Society has developed scripts for responding to irrationality, yet simply instructing an agitated person to "calm down" typically escalates the situation rather than diffusing it.

In some cases, chaotic systems and individuals lead to unpredictable outcomes. In Las Vegas, people repairing their cars spotted aliens and opted to involve the police.

When questioned about their lack of photographic evidence, it seems that this response reflects a cultural norm in America. The absence of a reaction to such encounters highlights our society's failure to take the possibility of extraterrestrial life seriously, regardless of its authenticity.

WHEN IN ROME We need a culturally accepted way to welcome strangers from afar. The reality is that every human culture appears strange to others. Given the vast array of behavioral models shared globally, one might expect a foundational philosophy promoting greater harmony.

And perhaps we do have one. Generally, humans are willing to tolerate significant deviations from cultural norms, adhering to principles that discourage harm to one another and respect property. Most legal systems revolve around these concepts, and a common agreement exists: do not harm children or engage with them without parental permission.

From a sociological standpoint, children should be nurtured under a unified philosophy and only exposed to diversity once they reach a certain level of maturity for their well-being. Rapid exposure to multiple belief systems may lead to confusion and indecision.

The United States boasts unprecedented diversity and outcomes compared to any previous civilization. While challenges remain, many issues can be attributed to individuals who incite unnecessary discord. One of the most profound philosophical ideas promoting inclusive treatment of humanity emerged in 1960s America through Star Trek, which depicted unity among various cultures, races, and species, emphasizing the importance of minimizing conflict when possible.

This vision garnered global admiration and became a cultural phenomenon, as countless individuals aspired to see this future realized.

However, the decline of Star Trek suggests that some have misinterpreted its philosophy, particularly when confronted with first contact scenarios. When aliens arrived in Las Vegas, humans did not extend a friendly greeting or offer assistance.

It could be argued that the aliens also failed to communicate their peaceful intentions. When someone knocks at your door, it is customary for you to speak first and offer assistance, rather than resorting to aggression. While some may choose to ignore a neighbor’s distress, many individuals around the world have treated me with kindness, eager to share their lives and customs.

Instead of fostering neighborly relations, the humans called law enforcement. This reveals a lack of understanding regarding the appropriate response to extraterrestrial visitors. Given the potential risks, involving the police in first contact situations may not be the best choice. A darker narrative exists within Star Trek’s mirror universe, where Zefram Cochrane reacts violently to Vulcans instead of seeking friendship.

This suggests that humans may not want the military overseeing initial contact, as their protocols typically prioritize aggression over diplomacy. The presence of advanced technology can turn even allies into perceived threats.

At this moment, it appears that governments may have knowledge of extraterrestrial existence but wish to exploit this information, resulting in a war against the general populace to maintain secrecy.

Why? Because most people desire peaceful and normal relationships with their neighbors, embracing the exchange of ideas, cultures, and experiences.

War of the Worlds is not about 'them' versus 'us.' All wars in history have ultimately been conflicts among ourselves. There exists a battle against the belief in extraterrestrial life. Why is there such a vested interest in suppressing belief in aliens? In academia, theology is often dismissed as a serious subject.

It is perplexing that prominent publications like The Washington Post and The New York Times have not reported on testimonies from credible whistleblowers asserting the existence of alien technology and even deceased extraterrestrial beings.

Journalists need not personally believe every story they cover; their role is to report facts. If they decline to share this information, it raises questions about their biases or potential agendas against public belief in extraterrestrial life.

David Bates, in his piece under Bryce Zabel’s Trail of the Saucer, addresses this issue more effectively than I can. The question remains: why did The New York Times avoid reporting on UFOs in 2023?

This question deserves significant attention. When did personal beliefs overshadow factual reporting? Bates rightly points out that the evidence suggests the U.S. government does want us to accept the possibility of aliens. Notable figures have publicly asserted this reality since 2017, and yet skepticism remains.

The facts speak for themselves; belief is not a prerequisite for reporting. The comparisons drawn between various whistleblowers and figures in the UFO community highlight a persistent oversight in mainstream media.

Without thorough literature reviews, scientific discourse remains stunted.

In light of the absence of credible reporting, the public may need to rely on whistleblowers for accurate information. Until journalists and officials regain public trust, skepticism will persist.

Ultimately, it is crucial for society to prepare for the possibility of first contact.

What should we say when aliens appear at our doorstep?

I propose a warm greeting: "Hello, my name is John. I mean you no harm. Would you like some coffee? I’m eager to learn about you."

Avoid asking for technology or resorting to violence. Let’s be respectful, as they may carry unfamiliar pathogens. Intelligent species should understand this, and it’s wise to maintain a safe distance while allowing them to guide the interaction.

We must acknowledge that if they possess superior technology, they will dictate the terms of contact to ensure their safety.